Detection of polyomavirus BK reactivation after renal transplantation using an intensive decoy cell surveillance program is cost-effective.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Reactivation of polyomavirus BK (BKV) after renal transplantation can lead to allograft dysfunction or loss with early detection improving outcomes. Current guidelines recommend quantitative polymerase chain reaction for surveillance; however, urinary decoy cell detection is a potentially cost-effective alternative. We present the outcomes from an early intensive BKV surveillance program using decoy cell detection for initial screening starting 2 weeks after transplantation. METHODS Records for all recipients of kidney (n=211) or simultaneous kidney and pancreas (n=102) transplants performed over 2 years in a single center were reviewed. Follow-up was for a minimum of 1 year. Urine cytology screening was performed fortnightly from 0 to 3 months after transplantation, monthly from 3 to 6 months then every 2 months from 6 to 12 months. RESULTS Decoy cell positivity occurred in 56 of 313 patients (17.9%) with sustained decoy cell positivity (≥2 positive urine samples >2 weeks apart) present in 32 patients (10.2%). Twenty-four patients (7.6%) became viremic and three patients (1%) developed polyoma virus nephropathy. The median time after transplantation until decoy cell positivity was 78 days, decreasing to 67 days for patients with sustained positivity and 57 days for patients who developed polyoma virus nephropathy. No grafts were lost due to BKV during the study period. Decoy cell screening resulted in savings of approximately £135,000 over 2 years, when compared with routine surveillance by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS Clinically significant BKV reactivation occurs early after transplantation and can be reliably detected by decoy cell screening. A surveillance strategy for detecting BKV reactivation based on urine cytology is cost-effective.
منابع مشابه
بررسی مولکولی فعالیت مجدد ویروس BK در ادرار بیماران پیوند کلیه
Background & Amis: BK polyomavirus (BKV) is common infection of childhood that persists in kidney epithelium. BKV reactivation characterized by viruria occurs in 35% to 57% of renal allograft recipients. BK virus was detected in serum samples in 6% to 29% of these patients. BKV-associated nephropathy occurs in as many as 8% of renal allograft recipients and may lead to . This study was carri...
متن کاملBK polyomavirus nephropathy in two kidney transplant patients with distinct diagnostic strategies for BK virus and similar clinical outcomes: two case reports
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is an important cause of post-transplantation renal failure. We present two cases of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy who were submitted to contrasting strategies of clinical follow-up to BK polyomavirus reactivation, but progressed to a similar final outcome. CASE PRESENTATION Case 1 is a 37-year-old white man whose graft had never pres...
متن کاملPolyomavirus in renal transplantation: a hot problem.
Polyomavirus BK has emerged as an important complication after kidney transplantation. Although, BK nephropathy develops in only 1% to 5% of renal transplant recipients, its prognosis when present is very poor. The most accepted risk factor is the level of immunosuppressive treatment, but the serostatus of donor and recipient and the absence of human leukocyte antigen C7 in donor and/or recipie...
متن کاملTesting for polyomavirus type BK DNA in plasma to identify renal-allograft recipients with viral nephropathy.
BACKGROUND Reactivation of polyomavirus type BK (BK virus) is increasingly recognized as a cause of severe renal-allograft dysfunction. Currently, patients at risk for nephropathy due to infection with the BK virus are identified by the presence of cells containing viral inclusion bodies ("decoy cells") in the urine or by biopsy of allograft tissue. METHODS In a retrospective analysis, we per...
متن کاملInhibitory interactions between BK and JC virus among kidney transplant recipients.
BK and JC polyomaviruses can reactivate after transplantation, causing renal dysfunction and graft loss. The incidence of JC reactivation after renal transplant is not well understood. Here, we characterized JC reactivation using samples collected during the first year after transplantation from 200 kidney recipients. We detected BK and JC viruses in the urine of 35 and 16% of transplant recipi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Transplantation
دوره 92 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011